![]() ![]() The hardware may provide the horsepower, but it’s the software that truly provides the experience. Both devices include the ability to connect to a projector or widescreen TV to output to a screen for presentations or multimedia viewing. Both devices have front and rear cameras for photo and video, but the Xoom is the clear winner with twice the resolution in the front facing camera and an even wider gap on the rear facing. The Xoom has an odd placement for the on/off button on the back of the device that leaves the user hunting. The iPad is thinner, lighter, and sleeker, showcasing Apple’s design flare. Despite the higher resolution screen of the Xoom, the iPad screen produces a clearer, brighter image. The Xoom’s screen is slightly larger and higher resolution than the iPad. The iPad 2 and the Xoom both run on 1 GHz dual core processors. Let’s start by taking a look under the hood. So with more choices available in the market, how does one go about deciding on a tablet? Let’s compare and contrast these two devices across several of the key feature areas. ![]() Not long after Motorola brought the Xoom to the marketplace, Apple unveiled the iPad 2, an updated version of their original iPad. As 2011 has unfolded, Motorola came to the market with the Motorola Xoom, the first Android-powered device to implement Honeycomb, a new version of Android specifically designed for tablet devices. ![]() And, for Apple’s competitors, it has opened up a new market that until now didn’t even exist. With more than 14 million units sold in 2010 alone, the iPad has gone on to be a resounding success for Apple. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |